I recently came across something interesting while reading Mary L Boas text on Mathematical Methods.
Has it ever bothered you, why the power series of a pretty function like converges only for
, even though there's nothing strange which happens at
? For example, if you take
, it's easy to see that there's a singularity at
. But what's the catch here? What's wrong with the power series of
at
? This apparent conundrum is actually trivial when one looks at it from the complex perspective. Consider the complex function,
Since is infinite when
,
isn't analytic in any region containing
. Now, there's a theorem that says that, since
is analytic at points other than
, it converges inside the circle centered at the origin and extending to the singularity at
. From this, one can clearly see that when
, and the corresponding power series also converges only when
.
The lesson here is that looking at things from a complex perspective might give important insights in the real case.
Saturday, April 14, 2007
On convergence
Posted by
Siddharth
at
6:01 AM
Labels: mathematics
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Hold yer horses! What do you mean 1/(1+x^2) 'converges'? That it has a limit as x -> 1 ? But _of course_ it has a limit, and it is 1/2! Why should you even think of the complex plane? I do not also understand what is the problem with it as x -> 1, why should you _suspect_ anything wrong at all, in the first place?
That, or I need more sleep :-)
Ok, I meant the power series of 1/(1+x^2). I should be more careful with my wording. I've edited it now.
Ah, peace :-)
Post a Comment